Michigan Senate Candidate Faces Backlash After Viral Clip Reveals Violent Remarks About Supreme Court Justices
DETROIT, Mich. — Mallory McMorrow, a Democratic candidate vying for a U.S. Senate seat in Michigan, is under intense scrutiny after a video clip surfaced showing her describing a violent fantasy involving conservative Supreme Court Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh. The remarks, made during a November event, quickly went viral on social media, igniting fierce backlash from conservative commentators and political opponents.
At a gathering hosted by Huron Valley Indivisible on November 12, McMorrow was asked whether there was any point in engaging with the Supreme Court, which she blamed for many grievances. In response, the former Michigan State Senator and Notre Dame graduate said she was infuriated by Barrett’s connection to her alma mater. She recounted hearing from someone who had seen Barrett and Kavanaugh at a football tailgate, adding, “I would not have been able to control myself. That would be bad. There would be beers thrown in peoples’ faces.”
The incendiary comment quickly drew condemnation from conservative circles. The National Republican Senatorial Committee issued a statement saying, “She needs help.” Club for Growth President David McIntosh labeled her a “crazed and violent radical,” while National Review senior editor Charles Cooke questioned why politicians would openly boast about losing control over their emotions. Wall Street Journal columnist Kyle Smith criticized the remarks as unbecoming of a public servant.
Other critics pointed to a broader pattern of Democratic politicians allegedly encouraging hostility toward Supreme Court justices. The Federalist’s editor-in-chief Molly Hemmingway tweeted that such rhetoric was part of a disturbing trend, while GOP operative Steve Guest accused Democrats of openly threatening violence. Conservative commentator A.G. Hamilton suggested McMorrow seek professional help rather than pursue a Senate seat.
Despite multiple requests from news outlets, McMorrow’s campaign has not responded to inquiries about the clip. The controversy comes as she competes in a crowded Democratic primary, where her progressive stances have already drawn both support and criticism.
Legal experts note that while political speech is broadly protected under the First Amendment, statements that could be interpreted as threats against public officials raise serious concerns. The U.S. Courts system has mechanisms to investigate and address threats against federal judges and justices, underscoring the sensitivity of such remarks.
This episode highlights the increasingly polarized atmosphere surrounding the Supreme Court, which has been at the center of contentious political battles over issues ranging from reproductive rights to election laws. The Supreme Court itself has faced unprecedented public scrutiny and protests in recent years.
As the 2026 midterm elections approach, candidates on both sides of the aisle are navigating a fraught landscape where rhetoric and policy positions on the judiciary can have significant electoral consequences. The backlash against McMorrow underscores the risks political figures face when expressing extreme sentiments about sitting justices.
For more on the role of the judiciary in American politics and election-related legal frameworks, see resources from the Federal Election Commission and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.
Leave a Reply