Investigation Reveals Deep Partisan Bias in 2025 Broadcast Media
WASHINGTON, D.C. — As the year 2025 draws to a close, a comprehensive investigation into broadcast media has laid bare a pervasive partisan tilt that continues to erode public trust in major news outlets. The report, highlighted by Fox News on December 27, exposes how networks such as ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS have increasingly abandoned journalistic objectivity in favor of emotional and politically charged propaganda.
The investigation cites numerous examples throughout 2025 demonstrating the media’s growing bias, including high-profile incidents like NPR CEO Katherine Maher’s congressional testimony and the brief suspension of late-night host Jimmy Kimmel. These events underscore the challenges facing broadcast journalism as it struggles to maintain credibility amid intensifying political divisions.
One particularly striking moment occurred on ABC’s “The View” in June, when co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin attempted to defend the United States against comparisons to authoritarian regimes. Her remarks — “I think it’s very different to live in the United States in 2025 than it is in Iran” — were met with immediate pushback from fellow co-host Whoopi Goldberg, who countered, “Not if you’re Black!” This exchange encapsulated the emotionally charged and often polarized discourse dominating broadcast media.
Further illustrating the media’s partisan leanings was a March 30 segment on CBS’s “60 Minutes,” where former Israeli hostage Keith Siegel described his captivity by Hamas militants. Instead of straightforward reporting, correspondent Lesley Stahl appeared to defend Hamas by questioning whether the captors deliberately starved Siegel or simply lacked food. Siegel’s blunt rebuttal — that his captors ate in front of him without offering food — highlighted the program’s controversial approach.
The report also critiques the soft treatment of prominent political figures and celebrities. For instance, PBS’s “NewsHour” aired a May interview with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that was characterized by gentle questioning and applause from a live audience of San Francisco liberals. Pelosi’s dismissive description of Republican opposition to Obamacare as “doggy doo” was met with little challenge, reflecting a departure from rigorous journalism.
Similarly, actor George Clooney received uncritical praise during a March 23 “60 Minutes” interview, where he equated journalism with warfare in the fight for truth. The segment failed to hold Clooney accountable or probe deeper into his statements, underscoring the media’s tendency toward puffball interviews rather than tough scrutiny.
These examples contribute to a broader trend identified by the investigation: broadcast networks have increasingly become platforms for partisan messaging rather than impartial news sources. This shift has contributed to a widespread public perception that media outlets serve as “daily advertising” for one side of the political spectrum, particularly amid the ongoing political drama surrounding President Donald Trump’s second term.
The erosion of trust in broadcast journalism has significant implications for democracy, as informed citizenry depends on access to fair and accurate information. The Federal Communications Commission continues to monitor broadcast standards, while organizations like the Pew Research Center document public attitudes toward media credibility.
Meanwhile, NPR’s leadership has faced scrutiny, with CEO Katherine Maher’s recent testimony before Congress drawing attention to the challenges of maintaining neutrality in a polarized environment. The suspension of Jimmy Kimmel, a late-night host known for his political commentary, further exemplifies the tensions between entertainment and responsible journalism.
As Americans navigate a media landscape fraught with bias and partisanship, calls for greater accountability and adherence to journalistic ethics grow louder. The Society of Professional Journalists advocates for standards that emphasize truth, fairness, and independence — principles that critics argue have been compromised in 2025’s broadcast coverage.
Looking ahead, the media’s ability to regain public trust will depend on its commitment to balanced reporting and resisting the allure of partisan narratives. Until then, many viewers remain skeptical, increasingly turning to alternative sources for news and analysis.
Leave a Reply