Retired FBI Agent Urged Criminal Probe into Elon Musk’s Use of X, Drawing Clinton Email Comparison
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A now-retired FBI agent sought to initiate a criminal investigation into Elon Musk’s use of the social media platform X during his tenure leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in 2025, according to an email exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital. The agent drew parallels between Musk’s activities and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s controversial use of a private email server, a comparison that underscores the sensitivity of the issue within federal circles.
The email, which was submitted as a legally protected whistleblower disclosure to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, was sent amid growing scrutiny of Musk’s policies and conduct while overseeing DOGE. Notably, the communication came after Musk implemented a contentious mandate requiring federal employees to report weekly on five tasks they completed, a move that sparked debate over workplace oversight and transparency.
While the email does not explicitly detail the nature of Musk’s alleged misuse of X, the retired agent’s call for a criminal probe suggests concerns about potential violations of federal regulations or misuse of government-related communications. The comparison to Clinton’s email scandal, which involved classified information being handled on a private server, highlights fears that Musk’s use of the platform could have compromised sensitive data or breached protocol.
The FBI has confirmed to Fox News Digital that no formal investigation was ever opened into Musk’s conduct. This aligns with public statements indicating that, despite internal discussions, the matter did not escalate to an official inquiry within the bureau. However, the revelation of the email sheds light on internal debates within federal law enforcement about how to handle high-profile figures operating at the intersection of government and technology.
Elon Musk’s leadership at DOGE, a federal agency tasked with improving government efficiency, has been marked by unconventional approaches and controversial policies. His mandate requiring detailed weekly reporting from federal employees was seen by some as an effort to increase accountability, while others criticized it as burdensome and intrusive.
The episode recalls the broader challenges government agencies face in regulating the use of digital platforms by public officials and employees. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has long grappled with balancing privacy, transparency, and security concerns in an era where social media and digital communication are deeply intertwined with official duties.
Meanwhile, the comparison to the Clinton email controversy evokes memories of one of the most scrutinized political scandals of the past decade. That case, investigated extensively by the Department of Justice, centered on the handling of classified information and raised questions about cybersecurity and accountability at the highest levels of government.
As Musk continues to wield significant influence both in the private sector and in government roles, the incident highlights the ongoing tensions between innovation, oversight, and legal boundaries. The Senate Judiciary Committee remains a key forum for examining such issues, particularly as whistleblower disclosures bring internal concerns to the public eye.
For now, the FBI’s decision not to pursue a formal investigation leaves many questions unanswered about the extent and implications of Musk’s use of X. However, the episode serves as a reminder of the complex interplay between technology, governance, and law enforcement in the digital age.
Leave a Reply