Border Patrol Commander Defies Judge’s Order, Vows Continued Tear Gas Use in Minneapolis
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. — In the wake of a federal judge’s recent order barring the use of tear gas against peaceful demonstrators, a senior Border Patrol official has pledged that federal agents will continue deploying tear gas against violent protesters in Minneapolis. The announcement comes amid heightened tensions and ongoing unrest in the Twin Cities following a deadly incident involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
Gregory Bovino, Border Patrol commander overseeing Operation Metro Surge, made clear on January 17 that tear gas will remain a tool for law enforcement confronting violent agitators who “cross the line.” Speaking on Fox News Live, Bovino emphasized that federal officers will apply “the minimum amount of force necessary to accomplish our mission,” signaling a firm stance despite the judicial restrictions imposed by a Minnesota federal judge the day before.
The judge’s order specifically prohibits the use of tear gas against peaceful protesters, reflecting concerns raised by civil liberties groups and local officials about excessive force during demonstrations. However, Bovino distinguished between peaceful protesters and those engaged in violent acts, asserting that the Border Patrol’s deployment of tear gas targets only the latter.
This development underscores the ongoing challenges faced by federal agencies such as the Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection in managing public safety amid protests and civil unrest. The operation in Minneapolis is part of a broader federal response to escalating violence and unrest in the city, which has drawn national attention and sparked debates about law enforcement tactics.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has supported the use of force measures deemed necessary to restore order, while local authorities have expressed mixed reactions to federal intervention. The tension between federal and local jurisdictions remains a significant factor in the unfolding situation.
Civil rights organizations have criticized the use of tear gas and other crowd-control measures, arguing that they can escalate tensions and harm peaceful demonstrators. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been vocal in opposing aggressive tactics that risk infringing on constitutional rights, particularly the right to peaceful assembly.
Despite these criticisms, Bovino’s remarks signal a continued federal commitment to aggressive crowd control tactics in Minneapolis, especially against those deemed violent. The Border Patrol commander’s comments also reflect the Trump administration’s broader approach to immigration enforcement and public order, which has often emphasized a hardline stance.
As the situation evolves, federal agencies, local governments, and advocacy groups remain engaged in a complex dialogue over the appropriate balance between maintaining public safety and protecting civil liberties. The ongoing use of tear gas by federal agents in Minneapolis will likely remain a contentious issue, drawing scrutiny from courts, lawmakers, and the public alike.
Leave a Reply