International Criminal Court Faces Crisis of Credibility Amid Sexual Assault Allegations Against Top Prosecutor
THE HAGUE, Netherlands — The International Criminal Court (ICC) finds itself engulfed in a profound crisis of legitimacy as its chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, confronts explosive allegations of repeated sexual assault. These accusations have surfaced at a critical juncture, as Khan aggressively pursues arrest warrants against prominent Israeli officials, deepening doubts about the institution’s impartiality and credibility.
Khan has been accused of sexually assaulting a junior ICC employee over a period exceeding one year, including incidents occurring on ICC premises. The allegations further include retaliatory actions against the whistleblower and supporters of the alleged victim. A second accuser from a prior professional relationship has also come forward with similar claims. Khan has vehemently denied all accusations, instead attributing his troubles to Israeli interference.
Since May 2025, Khan has been on paid leave while the ICC has conducted a protracted internal inquiry. On December 12, 2025, ICC officials announced the completion of the fact-finding phase of a confidential United Nations investigation. The case now enters a legal analysis stage, to be conducted by unnamed judicial experts over the next 30 days. This drawn-out process has fueled skepticism both within and outside the ICC about the institution’s willingness and capacity to hold its leadership accountable.
The timing of the scandal has been particularly damaging. In May 2024, just days after allegations began circulating internally, Khan abruptly canceled a planned visit to Israel. Instead, he publicly announced on CNN that he was seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. This move, coming after an unprecedented offer of cooperation from Jerusalem, was widely viewed as an attempt to deflect attention from the allegations and rally political support.
Observers note that Khan and his accuser both frame Israel as comparable to genocidal Hamas, a comparison that has drawn widespread criticism. Khan’s suggestion that his accuser, who is Muslim, may have been influenced by Israeli intelligence has been met with skepticism. A covert operation reportedly backed by Qatar to uncover any Israeli involvement found no evidence supporting this claim.
The ICC’s predicament is compounded by its already fraught relationship with the United States and Israel. The U.S. government has imposed sanctions on ICC officials over investigations targeting Americans and Israelis, further straining the court’s standing. The allegations against Khan threaten to deepen the divide and undermine the ICC’s mission to administer impartial international justice.
Legal experts and human rights advocates are closely monitoring the developments. The ICC’s ability to navigate this scandal while maintaining its investigations into alleged war crimes in Israel will be a litmus test for its future. Critics argue that the institution’s slow response and opaque processes have eroded public trust, making it increasingly difficult for the ICC to assert moral authority on the global stage.
For more information on the ICC’s mandate and ongoing investigations, visit the International Criminal Court official website. Details on the U.N. investigative procedures can be found at the United Nations Peace and Security portal. The U.S. Department of State provides updates on sanctions related to ICC activities at state.gov, while background on international justice mechanisms is available through the U.S. Department of Justice.
As the ICC grapples with these intertwined legal and ethical challenges, the global community watches closely, questioning whether the court can restore its battered reputation and uphold the principles of justice it was established to defend.
Leave a Reply