Minnesota Governor’s ‘Gestapo’ Remark on ICE Agents Highlights Media Coverage Disparities
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. — In a controversial statement last May, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz referred to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents as “Trump’s modern-day Gestapo,” a comparison that has sparked debate over media bias and the portrayal of federal immigration enforcement. Despite the inflammatory nature of the remarks, major national broadcast networks largely ignored the governor’s rhetoric, raising questions about uneven media scrutiny.
Governor Walz’s comments came during a law school graduation speech, where he accused ICE agents of “scooping folks up off the streets,” echoing a broader Democratic narrative that has increasingly framed ICE as a symbol of harsh immigration policies. Notably, this rhetoric persists despite the agency operating under the Biden administration, underscoring the political tensions surrounding immigration enforcement.
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, part of the Department of Homeland Security, has faced growing hostility amid calls from some Democrats to curtail deportations altogether. This antagonism has coincided with a surge in attacks against ICE personnel. According to reports, there has been an unprecedented 3,200% increase in car attacks targeting agents in the past year, a statistic that has received limited attention from mainstream broadcast outlets.
Incidents such as the September attack in Chicago, where an illegal immigrant ran over and dragged an ICE agent before being fatally shot, and a December event in St. Paul, Minnesota, where an agent was run over and another bitten during an apprehension, have gone largely unreported by ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS. The lack of coverage contrasts sharply with the extensive media focus on protests and violence directed at ICE, highlighting a perceived imbalance.
The death of Renee Nicole Good, who was fatally shot after allegedly threatening to drive into an ICE agent, further complicates the narrative. While activists have defended the right to protest ICE enforcement actions under the First Amendment, law enforcement officials emphasize the illegality of obstructing their duties. The tragedy has been widely covered, but critics argue that similar attention is not given to crimes committed against ICE agents or by illegal immigrants.
These disparities extend to the coverage of victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants. For example, the brutal rape and murder of 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray and the killing of Maryland mother Rachel Morin have not received the same media prominence as other stories. Meanwhile, trials involving illegal immigrant perpetrators have been overshadowed by extensive coverage of unrelated political events.
Experts suggest that the media’s approach reflects broader political dynamics, with many networks perceived as sympathetic to Democratic positions on immigration. The Department of Homeland Security continues to support ICE’s mission to enforce immigration laws, but public perception is shaped heavily by how incidents are reported.
As immigration remains a contentious issue in the 2026 election cycle, the role of media in shaping public opinion is under scrutiny. The contrasting treatment of ICE agents—as both targets of violence and subjects of political demonization—underscores the complexities of reporting on immigration enforcement in a polarized environment.
For further information on ICE operations and policies, visit the official ICE website. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection also provides data on border security efforts. Meanwhile, organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union offer perspectives on civil rights and immigration enforcement.
Leave a Reply