Super Bowl Coach and Olympians Rally Behind Female Athletes in Supreme Court Transgender Sports Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. — As the Supreme Court prepares to hear the landmark Little v. Hecox case in January, a coalition of prominent sports figures has stepped forward to defend laws restricting transgender athletes from competing in female sports categories. Among the signees of a recently filed amicus brief are Super Bowl-winning coach Barry Switzer and 31 Olympians, including 12 Olympic medalists, eight of whom earned gold medals. The brief supports Idaho and West Virginia legislation aimed at preserving competitive fairness and protecting female athletes from mental and physical harm.
Barry Switzer, renowned for leading the Dallas Cowboys to a Super Bowl victory, joins an array of notable athletes such as tennis legend Martina Navratilova and Olympic champions Kerri Walsh-Jennings, Summer Sanders, Donna de Varona, Nancy Hogshead, Laura Wilkinson, Jocelyne Lamoureux-Davidson, Monique Lamoureux-Morando, and Rhi Jeffrey. Former NFL quarterback Steve Stenstrom also lent his name to the brief. Several signees have personal experience competing against transgender athletes, including fencer Stephanie Turner, former NCAA volleyball player Macy Petty, University of Pennsylvania swimmer Monika Burzynska, and U.S. Masters swimmers Wendy Enderle, Cissy Cochran, and Angie Griffin.
The brief, which carries a total of 124 signatures including family members of athletes, argues that the laws in Idaho and West Virginia uphold the rights of women and girls to compete on a level playing field. It states, “By ruling in favor of West Virginia’s and Idaho’s laws, this Court can reaffirm that women should not lose their equal opportunity to compete in sports on a level playing field.” The document emphasizes that these protections are essential for preventing “mental and physical harm” to female athletes.
“It is hard to express the pain, humiliation, frustration, and shame women experience when they are forced to compete against males in sport,” the brief reads. “It is public shaming and suffering, an exclusion from women’s own category – a place that uniquely belongs to them… The shame does not disappear after competition is over. It stays forever as a memory of sanctioned public ridicule… The psychological, tangible, and long-term harm suffered by females forced to compete against males is irreversible.”
The case has drawn national attention as states across the country grapple with policies concerning transgender athletes in school and collegiate sports. Idaho Attorney General Raul Labrador has been vocal in defending the state’s law, which prohibits transgender females from participating in girls’ and women’s sports teams.
The Supreme Court’s upcoming decision could set a precedent affecting similar legislation nationwide. Advocates for the laws argue they protect fairness and safety in women’s sports, while opponents contend such restrictions discriminate against transgender individuals.
For more information on the legal framework surrounding transgender athletes, see resources from the Supreme Court of the United States and the U.S. Department of Justice. Details on state-level legislation can be found through the National Conference of State Legislatures. The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee also provides guidance on athlete eligibility and inclusivity policies.
As the court weighs these complex issues, the voices of elite athletes and coaches underscore the stakes involved in preserving competitive integrity and the rights of female athletes nationwide.
Leave a Reply